Förberedelser inför tredjebehandlingen

Update: Europaparlamentarikerna Eva Lichtenberger och Christian Engström bjuder tillsammans in till seminariet. Program kommer snart!

Nu var det så länge sen jag bloggade att alla som brukar hänga här säkert dragit vidare. Men jag känner själv att jag vill försöka fortsätta blogga. Om inte annat är det här min egen lilla kanal ut i spenaten :-)

Idag har jag skickat ut en inbjudan till ett seminarium om telekompaketet. Syftet är så klart att lyfta fram alla frågetecken som hopat sig under debatten, särskilt nu på sista tiden då både Frankrike och England lyft på förlåten och låtit oss glutta in en ny skön HADOPI-värld, med det senaste utspelet att The Honorable Minister Himself ska ha rätt att stänga ner/av/ute undersåtarnas oregerliga kärleksaffär med Nätet. Var det verkligen det telekompaketet skulle fixa?

Iallfall, här är inbjudan:

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Seminar on the Telecoms Package - Preparing for 3rd Reading
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:59:25 +0200
From: JOSEFSSON Erik
To: MEP Commission IMCO (Marché Intérieur et Protection des Consommateurs)
, =?iso-8859-1?Q?MEP_Commission_ITRE_=28Industrie, _Recherche_et_Energie=29?=
, MEP Commission JURI (Affaires Juridiques)
, MEP Commission LIBE (Libertés Civiles , Justice et Affaires Intérieures)

Dear Colleagues,

The Telecoms Package was the focus of many MEPs during their European election campaigns. I am therefore happy to invite you to a seminar to follow up on this engagement. The working title is "Seminar on the Telecoms Package - Preparing for 3rd Reading" and will take place on September 7, 14:00-16:00, in Room A1G-2 in the European Parliament (possible second session from 16:00-18:00). Full program will follow soon.

I believe it is in line with constituency expectations to go through the preparation of the 3rd reading in an open and transparent manner. A continued public debate is necessary since the essence of the user rights'-oriented amendments in 1st reading (e.g. amendment 166 to the Universal Servic Directive) is still at the core of the discussion on civil liberties on the Internet, and one 2nd reading amendment (the famous Amendment 138 to the Framework directive) strikes at the heart of national developments in this policy field.

In 3rd reading we are facing the challenge to ensure the Telecoms Package will not only protect users and preserve fundamental freedoms on the Internet, but also that the EU finds the right formula for innovation and growth. Failing these objectives puts a responsibility on the new Parliament to reject the package as a whole.

Prominent European bodies have made recent statements which point straight to the centre of the issue:

La liberté de communication et d'expression, énoncée à l'article 11 de la
Déclaration des droits de l'homme et du citoyen de 1789 [...] Cette liberté
implique aujourd'hui, eu égard au développement généralisé d'internet et
à son importance pour la participation à la vie démocratique et à l'expression
des idées et des opinions, la liberté d'accéder à ces services de communication
au public en ligne. [1]
- Conseil Constitutionel, Communiqué de presse, paragraph 1.3, 10 June 2009

Growing numbers of people rely on the Internet as an essential tool for everyday
activities (communication, information, knowledge, commercial transactions,
leisure), ultimately improving their quality of life and well-being. People
therefore expect Internet services to be accessible and affordable, secure,
reliable and ongoing. Access to these services also concerns the enjoyment
of human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as the exercise of democratic
citizenship.[2]
- 1st Council of Europe Conference of Ministers, paragraph 5, 28 and 29 May 2009

The seminar will deal with 3 questions:

* What Scope? Generally, is the Telecoms Package regulating infrastructure only, or is it also about content? Or more specifically, do the directives cover access to Internet services and applications, or only the transmission of signals? Is the scope of the Telecoms Package clearly defined and specific?

* Which Access? Under one interpretation given, broadband providers may legitimately block access to Internet services and applications, the only proviso is that they include it somewhere in the users' contract. Such blocks could include voice-over-IP or peer-to-peer file-sharing services, but could also include blocking of specific websites and technical protocols. How might such filtering of content affect innovation? Are proposals on graduated response part of a broad shift towards seeking more control of the Net and its users?

* Who's Power? Does "national measures" in Article 1.3 in USD [3] mean that governments can ask broadband providers to block access to Internet services and applications for a particular purpose, such as copyright enforcement? Do they include "technical measures" as well? Would such technical measures be mandatory?

The following speakers have accepted to participate in the (first) panel:

- Jeffrey Lawrence, Intel Corporation
- Andriani Ferti, Clifford Chance LLP
- Paolo Brini, www.scambioetico.org
- Francisco Mingorance, BSA
- Julia Group Representative, www.juliagruppen.se

Questions for the panellists to discuss and answer:

* On Scope
* Does the Telecoms Package contain provisions outside the scope of the current framework? Does an update of the current framework allow for e.g. the provision to allow ISPs to block or filter? Is there a risk more than access (i.e. also content) is regulated?
* Is there a risk the Telecoms Package will be captured by the old conflict between rightsholders and ISPs/media sector/technology companies?
* What happened to 'mere conduit'?

* On Access
* On what basis could a user be blocked to use Bit Torrent to download software under current framework? Did this change in the Telecoms Package? Would the same argument block email?
* Is the eircom settlement a private, out-of-court agreement to impose automated sanctions on users which could mandate restrictions on the use of Internet technologies?
* Does the eircom settlement fulfil the requirement of 2nd reading amendment 138? What difference does it make that it is an out of court decision?
* Managing traffic for the benefit of all versus squeezing money out if dependent customers: Where is the line to be drawn for responsible traffic management? Will people have to ask permission and potentially pay extra to view their own email? Would this be a restriction on the fundamental right to communicate?
* Are new ISP powers opening up for a Permission Based Economy? Will users have to get permission to carry out activities that they currently do today as a normal right?
* Growth of the creative and Internet economy in Europe: what could result from the suggested policy (potential benefits/ costs)? what is the effectiveness of filtering/blocking users access?

* On Power
* Does the 2nd reading text allow Member State governments to ask internet access providers and/or internet service providers to block and/or filter access to content, services and/or applications? Does the current framework allow the same?
* Will the proposed "national measures" equate to a mandate for industry to impose automated sanctions onto users? If so, would users have means of redress?
* Should an administrative authority have the authority to restrict Internet access for end-users? Should a government Minister?
* Which legal concepts are fitting in the context of "access to information" of the ECHR and Telecoms regulation (e.g. "restrictions", "limitations", "conditions"). What possible meanings could be carried?
* To what extent does the ECHR notion of "access to information" cover information exchange on the Internet? And does interact with what exactly is the scope of the Telecoms Package?

I firmly believe there is time for a proper policy debate, even under the time constraints of the 3rd reading (for your convenience, I attach references to the procedure below) and warmly welcome you to start this debate on September 7, which is the expected date of the Council decision to start the 3rd reading.

Best regards,

Erik Josefsson

Third Reading Guidelines

The Conciliation negotiations for the Telecom Package (Trautmann, Del Castillo and Harbour reports) are likely to start in September. Parliament approves or rejects the negotiated text by simple majority in a single vote (see guidelines [4]). EP's Legislative Observatory forecasts the plenary vote to 15 December, 2009 [5].

References

[1] http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/francais/l...

[2] http://www.ministerialconference.is/media/images/MCM2009011_en_final_web...

[3] http://euwiki.org/2002/22/EC/SECOND_READING#Article_1

[4] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/code/conciliation/default_en.htm http://www.europarl.europa.eu/code/information/guide_en.pdf

[5] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/file.jsp?id=5563972

Jo, det kunde vara snyggare och och tajtare, men det snygga och tajta programmet ska vi jobba fram imorgon :-)

I <3<3<3 etherpad! (där programmet faktiskt ser lite tajtare ut).

Nu återstår vilken MEP som ska öppna, ordföra och avsluta mötet. Jag jobbar på cross-party linjen :-)

RkblymknmsKqIZt

3pL2Q7 tbcyzghyffyb, [url=http://jqkdlckowkjx.com/]jqkdlckowkjx[/url], [link=http://cvuzqkfyroud.com/]cvuzqkfyroud[/link], http://zdrfsxmofinp.com/

beats by dre

The U.S. space policy experts rand discount beats by dre and bloomberg's said, should allow the billionaires and private

companies to buy the moon or the planets in the land, used for mining, the development of tourism, or for real estate development. Bloomberg's and that, if the government

allowed the billionaires and private company has the property right of land the planet, they might flock to have contributive buy. He pointed out that the time is ripe.
And Mr's proposal for a law, avoid concluded in 1967 the outer space treaty. beats by dr dre The outer space treaty

provisions or the government may not be any individual to any objects in space put sovereignty request. The move marks on the attitude of human space great changes, prevent

objects in space and time from colonial Africa similar "was divided up" fate. If a country has put forward to other planet sovereignty request, will ignite the outer space

treaty contracting state's anger.
He said he can pass a bloomberg has room for manoeuvre legal avoid treaty, also is not expressly forbid anyone who owns other planet of the land. According to wired magazine web

site reported, and bloomberg's advice is what is called a "Space colonial award Act" (Space Settlement Prize Act), 3 month in American think-tank competition enterprise

association announced.
Any new laws have to face signed in 1979's "the moon agreement. The agreement is designed to prevent any country to put forward the moon sovereignty request, however, the United

States and Russia and other powers did not sign the agreement to the moon ". dr dre beats And Mr Tim said: "" the moon

agreement signing GuoShao poor. This means that there are no real legal ban, ban private have the moon, Mars or other planet land, and to other countries of the planet ban land

proposed sovereignty request." However, if not on the moon, and even allow private have the moon land property rights, only an empty talk. At present, Richard branson's virgin

galactic company has not been commercial orbital flights, let alone visit to another planet.
And Mr Tim said: "a lot of people think that stone also have their rights, I was one of them." The U.S. space law lawyer Michael Reese Turner told wired magazine in an interview

points out that on the moon, or other planets land property right of proposed requirements is a "very difficult issues". He said: "the proposed requirements of the government

will encounter the world against, which is the political will of a great reputation will also test, because this kind of request badly hit, so it is difficult to get it. If

everywhere will appear and the United States the development of the western region similar situation. New Style Beats By Dre

At the time, the U.S. government has launched a series of attractive land policy, prompted a lot of people to the west looking for

opportunity."
For other planet of land property right now just stop at the debate stage. On earth, the territorial dispute has never stopped. Recently, a British firm 5 into the falkland

islands in surrounding areas oil exploration, strongly criticized by Argentina. So are the arctic. Denmark insists he has the arctic sovereignty, shall have the right to the

arctic waters exploration.

beats by dre

The U.S. space policy experts rand discount beats by dre and bloomberg's said, should allow the billionaires and private

companies to buy the moon or the planets in the land, used for mining, the development of tourism, or for real estate development. Bloomberg's and that, if the government

allowed the billionaires and private company has the property right of land the planet, they might flock to have contributive buy. He pointed out that the time is ripe.
And Mr's proposal for a law, avoid concluded in 1967 the outer space treaty. beats by dr dre The outer space treaty

provisions or the government may not be any individual to any objects in space put sovereignty request. The move marks on the attitude of human space great changes, prevent

objects in space and time from colonial Africa similar "was divided up" fate. If a country has put forward to other planet sovereignty request, will ignite the outer space

treaty contracting state's anger.
He said he can pass a bloomberg has room for manoeuvre legal avoid treaty, also is not expressly forbid anyone who owns other planet of the land. According to wired magazine web

site reported, and bloomberg's advice is what is called a "Space colonial award Act" (Space Settlement Prize Act), 3 month in American think-tank competition enterprise

association announced.
Any new laws have to face signed in 1979's "the moon agreement. The agreement is designed to prevent any country to put forward the moon sovereignty request, however, the United

States and Russia and other powers did not sign the agreement to the moon ". dr dre beats And Mr Tim said: "" the moon

agreement signing GuoShao poor. This means that there are no real legal ban, ban private have the moon, Mars or other planet land, and to other countries of the planet ban land

proposed sovereignty request." However, if not on the moon, and even allow private have the moon land property rights, only an empty talk. At present, Richard branson's virgin

galactic company has not been commercial orbital flights, let alone visit to another planet.
And Mr Tim said: "a lot of people think that stone also have their rights, I was one of them." The U.S. space law lawyer Michael Reese Turner told wired magazine in an interview

points out that on the moon, or other planets land property right of proposed requirements is a "very difficult issues". He said: "the proposed requirements of the government

will encounter the world against, which is the political will of a great reputation will also test, because this kind of request badly hit, so it is difficult to get it. If

everywhere will appear and the United States the development of the western region similar situation. New Style Beats By Dre

At the time, the U.S. government has launched a series of attractive land policy, prompted a lot of people to the west looking for

opportunity."
For other planet of land property right now just stop at the debate stage. On earth, the territorial dispute has never stopped. Recently, a British firm 5 into the falkland

islands in surrounding areas oil exploration, strongly criticized by Argentina. So are the arctic. Denmark insists he has the arctic sovereignty, shall have the right to the

arctic waters exploration.

ms office 2010

AETRDSF H Valuable information ..I am delighted to read this article..thank you for giving us this useful information. Great walk-through. I value this post.

Vendita abbigliamento

Vendita abbigliamento Woolrich. Prende questo tipo di percorso per dare senso della persona è la persona attiva o per uso domestico che si rifiuta di muoversi e occasioni per la compensazione irragionevolmente alto quando la terra è requisita per un progetto di
woolrich
costruzione. L'abbigliamento in sostanza può avere contemporaneamente due colori di cui sopra, non importa dove il blu contrasto bianco rosso cenere scatena manifesta caratteristica questa strada per rendere ampiamente conosciuto. Le scarpe da ginnastica e pantaloni di maglia sarà questo tipo di amore più persona. Ma mi piace questo tipo di percorso soprattutto, perché questo tipo di percorso dà sempre l'essere umano di sentirsi non maturo.

Microsoft Office

EWATKERA Valuable information ..I am delighted to read this article..thank you for giving us this useful information. Great walk-through. I value this post.

burberry outlet

burberry outlet online
burberry outlet
burberry online
burberry sale
burberry store

UGGS Clearance

Ugg boots have managed to realize this feat. It is actually also explained the term ugg is often a slang originating in Australia and that it usually means 'ugly'.
UGG Boots Clearance
UGG Clearance
UGGS Clearance
UGG Boots Clearance Sale

Adding this siteurl is an

Adding this siteurl is an issue because when you want to distribute this to your customers the problem is when i change my servers – i have to repackage the wsp with the correct new site url – any workarounds for this?

Office 2010

I will keep your new article. I really enjoyed reading this post, thanks for sharing.

I never thought that this

I never thought that this really happens! ) You are a genius told a simple story in a nutshell! cool) Fast download
download serial

Group are the financial

Group are the financial gatherings organisation the sales.

Congratulations on a sharing

Congratulations on a sharing Thank you very nice .....

Hi.Nice post.Keep it up!

nashville web design There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration.
nashville haircut Hi, I agree with every statement that you have made in the post and I really appreciate your effort in gathering up the information. Thanks for it.
massage nashville Thank you for this great information, you write very well which i like very much. I am really impressed by your post
cca wire Very good post. Hope to see even more great posts in the future.
Home Garden Wood Very good post. Hope to see even more great posts in the future.

Don't even know what to say

Don't even know what to say on this topic. So much ideas are mixed in my head after reading it. Very problematic article I think

I appreciate the great post

I appreciate the great post you share in your articles. I’ll bookmark your blog and have my readers read here often. I am quite certain they will read lots of fresh articles in your blog than anybody else!650-195 papers//650-251 papers//650-296 papers//650-297 papers//650-367 papers//650-368 papers//650-369 papers//650-377 papers//650-378 papers//

belstaff jackets

Several elder brother will set up a joint venture company, in order to reveal the company's cow force, "ability", named!!!!!
"Ability company" listen more ambition! Cheerfully from industrial and commercial bureau to take it back to license, several elder brother confess, see

licence is greatly write "ability is limited company".

coach sunglasses are a

coach sunglasses are a professional manufacturer of coach glasses shops, high-quality, high-quality sunglasses designed to search for the other? coach sunglasses, coach glasses for sale ..... Welcome to our coach sunglasses on sale.Thank you for visiting and enjoy your shopping.

From 1910, Mademoiselle

From 1910, Mademoiselle Chanel sunglasses loved to expose her skin to the sun, in a time when this was still unheard of and certainly not socially acceptable; the upper classes and aristocracy preferred a pale white skin tone, as tanned skin was a sign of belonging to the working class. True to chanel sunglasses pearl own ideas and convictions, Mademoiselle made products available to her customers, which would enable them to enjoy the sun and sunbathe in total confidence. Thus the first CHANEL sunglasses appeared in 1965. CHANEL sale launched its chanel eyewear activity in 1999 in partnership with the market leader in chanel eyeglasses and chanel sunglasses.

Most recently, it released a

Most recently, it released a pink bracelet with a portion of proceeds going to breast cancer research efforts.

I wish I had found this site

Good to hear that you are

Good to hear that you are back to blogging. I am looking forward to some good article.

zcj11219880112 Thickening of

zcj11219880112
Thickening of your foot skin which is called callus often to be happened although it usually has no symptoms besides for cosmetic reasons,
Maplestory Mesos
Rift gold
sometimes it can feels hurt or may lead to other problems such as skin ulceration or infection Callus is the body's defense mechanism to protect the foot against excessive pressure and friction.

Furqan

I found this is an informative and interesting post so i think so it is very useful and knowledgeable. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing ability has inspired me. Really the article is spreading its wings rapidly...
testking 642-357\testking 642-515\testking 000-152\testking 000-105
Regards,
MichaeL
IT Consultants

Missa inte där nere hur SJ

Missa inte där nere hur SJ numera drar sitt strå till stacken för passagerardatans insamlande.

Kul att du är där och styr upp

Hej Erik,
Det är så rätt att du är där!! Ska följa allt med stort intresse. Får man önska sig en populärversion av tredje-läs längre fram som kan läsas av oss med lite mindre tek-kompetens ;) ? Hade varit kanon. Allt gott!
Många hälsningar
Annika

Joergen Samuelsson?

hej erik,
om detta är ett sätt att nå dej.. Har du fått kontakt med mr Samuelsson , antar att det är denne man: http://www.xing.com/profile/Joergen_Samuelsson

som uttalat sej sålunda:
Eller som Sveriges representant i EU:s expertråd, Jörgen Samuelsson ...[sagt] l: ”Parlamentet har föreslagit att inga begränsningar i fundamentala rättigheter får göras utan föregående beslut av en rättslig, kompetent myndighet. Ingen i rådet förstår varför det skulle vara en god idé.”

här verkar behövas en rejäl afton på stan eller liknande :-)
om han fortfarande är inkopplad förståss ...... man kan ju hoppas.....att inte

Kul med lite blogg från dig!

Kul med lite blogg från dig! Det är en attans tur att vi har dig nere i Bryssel. :) Keep up the good work.

oroa dig inte!

Vi läser, och du fanns med på live.piratpartiet.se feed, så jag såg dig även om det var en stund sen du skrev.

*suck* om jag någon gång hade velat åka till bryssel... men men.
Jag litar på juliagruppen att göra ett bra jobb tillsammans med er där nere.

/Magnus

Skriv ny kommentar

Innehållet i detta fält är privat och kommer inte att visas publikt.
  • Webbadresser och e-postadresser görs automatiskt till länkar.
  • Tillåtna HTML-taggar: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Rader och stycken bryts automatiskt.

Mer information om formateringsmöjligheter